Suggested Design Techniques for Residential Slab Footings on Class ‘P’ or Difficult Sites

When approaching a class ‘P’ or Difficult site, engineers must find innovative, collaborative design solutions that mitigate risks to residential projects. There are several factors that may greatly affect the design of Slab Footings on these sites. When approaching a Class ‘P’ site, engineers at Intrax consider various elements, as discussed below, to find the most effective solution.

Typical Factors Influencing Sites as Class ‘P’ Classification:

  • Soft Soils
  • Trees (Existing/Removed)
  • Recently Demolished or Existing building on site
  • Land subject to Inundation (Flood)
  • Erosion Management Issues (Potential Landslip)
  • Mine subsidence Areas
  • Existing Infrastructure Services
  1. Soft Soils

When an engineer has encountered a site with soft soils the first step to take is to challenge and clarify the recommendations given by the geotechnical investigation.

Ensure compaction reports are sighted and/or fill assessment testing is done. The bearing capacity of the soil has to be determined at a particular depth and a conclusion has to be drawn to what would be the most cost-effective way to support the structure.

Then depending on variables, the support mechanisms could potentially be:

Deep footing system in the form of bored piers or screw piles.

This method creates a platform that is founded at a deeper soil horizon with a larger soil bearing capacity. The loads from the structure bypass the softer soils and are directly transferred to stronger stratum.

Stiffened slab.

When the supporting slab is sufficiently stiffened with adequate reinforcement, the loads from the superstructure are distributed evenly across the whole area of the slab. This is similar to how the snowshoes work.

The engineer should clarify the recommendations given by the geotechnical investigation to determine the slab reinforcement required in order to achieve the necessary stiffness of the slab. A ‘soft spot’ design can be recommended which involves a design based on a previously approved theory.

The edge beams of the slab are designed to cantilever over spots where there is a potential loss of support.

Soil remediation techniques.

In some cases, it is possible to carry out controlled soil compaction achieving the required bearing capacity. The soft soil (fill) can be stripped off the site and re-compacted in 150mm thick layers ultimately providing a satisfactory bedding for a foundation. This is done with soil compactors, rollers and excavators.

1. Trees (Existing/Removed)

When trees are encountered on site the engineer is to raise several questions:

  • Which climatic zone is the site located in? What is the suction depth (Hs), characteristic surface movement (Ys) and, surface movement due to tree (Yt)?
  • What type of tree: is it Deciduous or Native?
  • What is its influence zone, how high can the tree grow?
  • Is the tree in an immature or mature state?

When the above has been resolved and factored in computation the following footing systems can be implemented:

    Deep footing system.

    This type of footing transfers the loads of the structure below the Hs which is the suction depth of a particular tree in a particular climatic zone.

    Stiffened slab

    The slab can be stiffened to resist the additional ground movements due to the tree influence

    Tree removal

    When a tree has been removed the soil can experience re-moisturising which in turn can induce soil movements. A slab has to be sufficiently stiffened to account for that.

    Or, a wait is required till the moisture condition on site would stabilise. Typically it takes:

    • 12 to 18 months in climate zone 2
    • 24 to 36 months in climate zone 3

    2. Recently Demolished Building

    When an existing building has been recently demolished on site, there is a possibility of the soils encountered on site being in a moisture re-stabilisation. Slab stiffening is required to tackle this

    Or, a wait of 9-12 months is required for the soil moisture level to stabilise.

    3. Site Subject to Inundation (Flooding)

    A site is subject to inundation due to the regulations imposed by the relevant authority. It is the engineer’s responsibility to challenge the authorities about the relevance of a flood event at a particular site. The flood flow rate and FFL (in A.H.D) has to be determined before the design can commence. The design shall entail

    • Hydrostatic actions
    • Upward and Downward loads
    • Hydrodynamic actions
      • Lateral loads induced by water flow creating drag forces
      • Debris actions

    4. Erosion and scour

    To prevent scour the footing has to be founded into the natural soils

    1. Erosion Management issues

    After reviewing the geotechnical report the recommendations have to be clarified or challenged. To prevent erosion and landslip the engineer is to use one of the footing types.

    • Deep footing system such as bored piers or piles to reach the soil unaffected by the slip circle.
    • Use batter stabilisation techniques such as retaining walls, shotcrete, geotextile fabrics and composites

    2. Mine subsidence Areas

    The engineer is to challenge or clarify the recommendations given by the soil report. The client must be made aware of risks on these sites and potential for repair if required.

    Effects of mining include:

    • Vertical subsidence:  generally doesn’t affect structures on small footprints such as residential homes
    • Horizontal displacement (strains):  tensile and Compression Strains are a result of differential movement between two points. The forces are transferred via friction. Waffle raft footings in concert with a high grade plastic on a sand bed layer are ideal in this application.
    • Curvature and Tilt:  this occurs due to differential settlement at the surface. Good detailing such as ‘AJ’s in brickwork are recommended. Existing Infrastructure Services

    A slab needs to be designed considering the angle of repose of existing pipes in easements or other services. The following methods are commonly used to tackle this:

    • Deep footings
    • Slab bridging
    • Stiffened slab as cantilever design

    Conclusion

    Engineers face many challenges when engaging a Class P site. Design solutions must find innovative ways to manage issues and mitigate risks caused by the typical factors that influence these sites. The expertise Intrax brings to projects affected by difficult sites ensures an optimized engineering solution that achieves the best results and stands out amongst the competition.

    Phillip Campbell

    Chairman of the Board – Non-Executive Director and member of the risk committee

    Phillip Campbell is the Non-Executive Chairman of the Board of the Intrax Consulting Group.

    Phillip is an experienced company director with a demonstrated history of successful transformations of public and private organisations by focusing on the intrinsic value of the business, working behind the scenes to improve the effectiveness of management and building strong foundations for growth.

    Graduating from Queensland University with a Bachelors’ degree in Electrical Engineering, Phillip has been CEO/MD of a number of public and private companies in the manufacturing and engineering services sectors.

    He is a Graduate Member of the Australian Institute of Company Directors.

    Phillip has an abiding belief that a stable and safe family home environment is critical for children to achieve a sound education and establish the foundations of a productive life. This is one of the reasons he joined Anchor Inc and is currently its Chairman.

    Danny Borzillo

    Executive Director

    Danny Borzillo is an Executive Director.

    Danny has a broad range of experience gained over 30 years of working in the construction and engineering consultancy industries.

    Danny is the co-Founder of Intrax Consulting Engineers and was instrumental in the establishment of the Business in 2003. The early success of Intrax was mainly attributed to Danny’s innovation in the volume housing market and positioning Intrax to off its unique end to end service.

    Danny Borzillo held the position of Managing Director of Intrax and then joint Managing Director together with Robert Borzillo until March 2011 when Barry Borzillo was appointed.

    Prior to establishing and working at Intrax, Danny was involved in several small to mid-sized engineering consultancy businesses. His roles in these companies included Business Owner, Director and Senior Manager, providing consultancy design and construction advice and design services to the building industry.

    Danny holds a Bachelor of Engineering (Civil) from Victoria University, is a Chartered Member of the Australian Institute of Engineers and is a Member of several industry technical bodies.

    Barry Borzillo

    CEO/MD

    Barry Borzillo is the CEO/MD of the Intrax Consulting Group

    Barry has a broad range of experience in the construction, telecommunications, professional services and government outsourcing industries.

    Prior to his appointment in March 2011 as CEO/MD of Intrax, Barry held CEO roles for the ESH group, Tenix Solutions and Ericsson Australia/NZ. He spent nearly four years in the USA in senior roles with Ericsson Inc.

    Barry began his career at Ericsson in 1987 as part of the Graduate program. He holds a Masters of Business Administration (Executive) from the Australian Graduate School of Management, a Bachelors’ degree with Distinction in Electrical/Electronic Engineering from Victoria University, is a Fellow of the Australian Institute of Engineers and is a Graduate of the Australian Institute of Company Directors.

    Barry is passionate about improving educational outcomes in disadvantaged communities which is one of the reasons he joined the Ardoch Youth Foundation Board for ten years, the last five of which he was also the Chairperson.

    Andrew Taylor

    CFO & Company Secretary

    Andrew has more than 30 years of diverse and progressive senior financial experience in professional services, manufacturing and government industries. He is a trusted and proactive business partner, has developed and led high-performance teams, been a member of executive teams and Boards, and driven organisation change with profitability, working capital and structure.

    Prior to his appointment in April 2018 at Intrax, Andrew was regional CFO – Australia and NZ region at Aurecon. He spent 17 years at Aurecon leading the finance team, corporatising the business and driving operations across ANZ and Asia.

    Andrew is CPA qualified and holds a Bachelor of Business – Accounting.

    Andrew’s career highlights include: aligning and integrating 2 major businesses; the initiation, design and implementation of reporting and budgeting software globally; and development and leadership of a new Finance function for a growing company. Andrew enjoys team leadership, developing and mentoring others to reach their potential, and is passionate about maturing, evolving and improving companies and businesses.

    Nigel Guo

    Executive Director and CTO

    Nigel is the Chief Technology Officer of Intrax.

    Nigel joined Intrax in 2007 and rapidly rose through ranks with the business. Nigel completed a Bachelor of Structural and Civil engineer from University of Melbourne, and also earned a  Master of Business Administration from Melbourne Business School.

    Nigel has had many roles at Intrax, from engineer, to running the residential engineering and quality departments before being promoted into general management roles.

    He has played a key role in continuing process and system improvement at Intrax, developing most of the processes and procedures used in the housing departments today that have enabled Intrax to scale with quality, while consistently delivering to clients..

    In his spare time Nigel likes sketching, playing bass guitar and soccer.

    Robert Borzillo

    Non-Executive Director, member of the risk committee

    Robert Borzillo is a Non-Executive Director of the Intrax Consulting Group. Robert has over 40 years’ experience working as an engineer in various capacities within the Australian building Industry.

    Robert was a co-founder of Intrax Consulting in 2003 with a vision to establish a dynamic end to end values driven engineering consultancy delivering services into the residential housing and building construction industries in Australia

    Prior to the establishment of Intrax Consulting Robert was General Manager of Porta Moulding working within the Australian timber industry; in forestry, manufacture and distribution of timber products for the residential building and construction industries.

    In his earlier days, Robert also worked as an engineer for Humes Concrete. Involved in the design, manufacture, supply, and installation of precast concrete components for large scale civil and building infrastructure. Robert spent time working in Sydney NSW, and Far North Queensland on many projects. Prior to that Robert spent time with the Country Roads Board in road design and planning of Victorian road infrastructure.

    Robert earned a bachelor’s degree from Victoria University, BE Civil is a Certified Practicing Engineer CPE, is on the National Engineers Register. NER, and an accredited practicing engineer in most Australian states. Robert is also a graduate of the Australian Institute of Company Directors. GAICD.

    Robert’s passion outside of work is travel and snow skiing. He has had the privilege to combine these passions traveling extensively and skiing in Australia, New Zealand, USA, Japan, Italy, and Switzerland.